“This is a program that intrudes on people’s lives, just like the Environmental Protection Agency or the bank regulators,” and “We’re spending $70 per person to fill this out. That’s just not cost
effective,” he continued, “especially since in the end this is not a
scientific survey. It’s a random survey.”
So we have an elected member of the House who wants to eliminate work done by a very accomplished group of economists and statisticians and his basic argument is that it isn't scientific because its random. Never-mind that the first requirement of a "scientific survey" is that it protects against bias by using randomness. Help, somebody....anybody.
No comments:
Post a Comment