The latest data on CEO Pay (from the Economic Policy Institute):
"God can have opinions; everyone else should bring some data." often attributed to W. Edwards Deming, but most likely should be attributed to R. A. Fisher or George Box
Monday, June 22, 2015
Tuesday, February 17, 2015
Thursday, January 8, 2015
Krugman brings the data
Paul Krugman, though often shrill, nevertheless is an economist who pays attention to the data (see here). The graph below should make everyone involved in the debate (perhaps, a kind description of what passes for this in America today) think twice about their rigid views regarding fiscal policy.
Krugman says:
Krugman says:
The point is that 2010
was a real moment of truth. Were you going to go with the logic of more
or less Keynesian macroeconomic models, or were you going to decide
that loose psychological speculation about confidence trumped the
arithmetic of spending? Being a forthright Keynesian at the time meant
sticking out your neck quite a lot: you were running very much counter
to what the Very Serious People were saying, and you would have been
ridiculed and possibly suffered some serious career damage if US or UK
interest rates had soared the way the VSPs warned, if inflation had
taken off, if the correlation between government spending and GDP had
turned out to be negative instead of positive.
As it turned out,
however, the Keynesian view came out looking very good, and siding with
the VSPs was not a good move after all.
Tuesday, December 23, 2014
Thursday, August 7, 2014
Data on Grade Inflation in American Universities
Tim Taylor (see here) points us to research by Stuart Rojstaczer and Christopher Healy regarding grade inflation (see the following graph).
Rojstaczer and Healy state:
Even if grades were to instantly and uniformly stop rising, colleges and universities are, as a result of five decades of mostly rising grades, already grading in a way that is well divorced from actual student performance, and not just in an average nationwide sense.
Taylor notes (see here)
Like so many other bad habits, grade inflation is lots of fun until someone gets hurt. Students are happy with higher grades. Faculty are happy not quarreling with students about grades...
To me, the real and practical problem of grade inflation is that it causes students to alter their choices, away from fields with tougher grading, like the sciences and economics, and toward fields with easier grading.
Rojstaczer and Healy state:
Even if grades were to instantly and uniformly stop rising, colleges and universities are, as a result of five decades of mostly rising grades, already grading in a way that is well divorced from actual student performance, and not just in an average nationwide sense.
Taylor notes (see here)
Like so many other bad habits, grade inflation is lots of fun until someone gets hurt. Students are happy with higher grades. Faculty are happy not quarreling with students about grades...
To me, the real and practical problem of grade inflation is that it causes students to alter their choices, away from fields with tougher grading, like the sciences and economics, and toward fields with easier grading.
Monday, July 14, 2014
Saturday, July 12, 2014
The fall of "faculty governance"
Timothy Taylor (see here) has a new post entitled "Administrators Take Over Academia." Using recent research and data, he details how the notion of "faculty governance" - once a cornerstone of higher education - has declined to the point of irrelevance in some Universities. It seems to be the norm these days as universities continue to spread the "we are a business" propaganda without ever making clear what they mean by that. He shows the graph below which details the rise of this philosophy.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)